Kang 2010 Behavior During Preference Assessments (0.5 Units)

  • Teacher: Andrea Stayton
  • Released: 06/18/2017
  • Price: $ 5.00 (Free for users of 1 Year Complete Course Library)
Certificate:

Must pass quizzes with an average of 80%

Table of Contents

Viewed
Course Content

Description

Problem Behavior during Preference Assessments: An Empirical Analysis and Practical Recommendations (0.5 Units)

Preferences of 2 children with developmental disabilities, whose functional analyses indicated that their problem behavior was maintained by access to tangible items, were assessed using three formats (i.e., paired stimulus [PS], multiple-stimulus without replacement [MSWO], and free operant [FO]). The experimenter administered each format five times and compared levels of problem behavior across formats in a multielement design. Both participants exhibited problem behavior in PS and MSWO formats but not in the FO format. Results are discussed in terms of recommendations for practitioners.

Price

Plan Name Price
1 Year: $ 5.00

Teacher

Andrea Stayton

Andrea Stayton, M.S., BCBA

Approved Continuing Education Provider 
Board Certified Behavior Analyst - Level 1

Courses by this teacher

Name Level Release Date
Mandell 2008 Psychotropic Medication Children with Autism (3 units) 06/18/2017
Doughty 2007 Punished Stereotyped Behavior (2 Units) 06/18/2017
Dawson 2010 Denver Model (1.5 Units) 06/18/2017
Kang 2010 Behavior During Preference Assessments (0.5 Units) 06/18/2017
Morris 2009 Misrepresentation of ABA (3 Ethics Units) 06/18/2017
Lancaster 2005 Assessment and Treatment of Autism (2 Units) 06/18/2017
Bachmeyer 2009 Mealtime Behavior (2 Units) 06/18/2017
Deleon 2009 Assessment Outcomes (1 Unit) 06/18/2017
Bachmeyer 2009 Mealtime Behavior (2 Units) 06/18/2017
Nadjowski 2008 Caregiver FA of Mealtime Behavior (1 Unit) 06/18/2017
Lang 2008 F.A. Natural Vs. Contrived Conditions (1 Unit) 06/18/2017
Kang 2010 Behavior During Preference Assessments (0.5 Units) 06/18/2017
Koontz 2003 CPAP Compliance (2 Units) 06/18/2017
Deleon 2009 Assessment Outcomes (1 Unit) 06/18/2017
Bachmeyer 2009 Mealtime Behavior (2 Units) 06/18/2017
Shook 2004 Determining Content for ABA Practitioners (3.5 Units) 06/18/2017
Morris 2009 Misrepresentation of ABA (Total Units 3 ETHICS) 06/18/2017
Vollmer 2011 The ABAI Statement on Restraint and Seclusion (1.5 Units - Ethics) 06/18/2017
Ruiz 2007 Scientific Culture of Behavior Analysis (2.5 Units - ETHICS) 06/18/2017
Lewis 2008 Contingency Management Substance Use (2 Units) 06/18/2017
Bachmeyer 2009 Mealtime Behavior (2 Units) 06/18/2017
Behavior Modification (4 Units) 06/18/2017
PECS (2 Units) 06/18/2017
Teaching & Boundaries (2 Units) 06/18/2017
Toilet Training Techniques (2 Units) 06/18/2017
Kang 2010 Behavior During Preference Assessments (0.5 Units) 06/18/2017
Training Preschool Children with Visual Imagining – Kisamore 2012 (1 credit) 10/08/2017
Music and Reinforcement - Gold 2013, 1.5 Credits 01/01/2018
1 Year Complete Course Library 01/09/2018
Distance Supervision - 1 Supervision credit 01/18/2018
Turner et. al 2016 Supervision of ABA Trainees – 1 Supervision unit 09/13/2018
Sellers et al (2016) Ethics of Supervision - 1 Supervision credit 11/13/2018
Sellers et al 2016 Recommended Practices for Supervision - 1 Supervision unit 01/20/2019
Rodriguez et al (2012) FA and Treatment of Arranging by Individuals with Autism - 2.5 units 02/13/2019
Smith et al (2012) Multiple Respondent Anecdotal Assessments_ An Analysis - 2 units 02/13/2019
Wilson et al (2012) Computer-assisted Measurement of Wound with Self Injury - 1 unit 02/13/2019
Walker _ Rehfeldt (2012) Evaluation of Stimulus Equivalence for Distance Education - 1.5 units 02/13/2019
Scheithauer _ Tiger (2012) Computer Program to Teach Braille to the Sighted - 1 unit 02/13/2019
ABA Course 1 06/18/2017
ABA Course 2 06/18/2017
ABA Course 3 06/18/2017
ABA Course 4 06/18/2017

Requirements

Misc.:

For this test the minimum wait time before you can take the test is 20 minutes. You will need to wait at least this long after you have purchased the course before you can take the test and have it count. If you take it sooner, you will have to retake the quiz before your certification can be validated.

Regulations dictate how long you must study prior to taking the final quiz. Due to this requirment you must wait the designated amount of time [ABOVE] before you take the test.

By purchasing this course you acknowledges that you qualify for CEUs and be in compliance with the Behavior Analysis Certification Board (BACB):

  • CEUs will not be provided for tests that score below 80%. Once completed, Certificates of Completion for each article purchased will be available for you to view and download by clicking the "My Certificates" link at the top of the webpage after you click the Users button.
  • The link to the CEU test will include a login name.  It is recommended that you DO NOT begin reading the article until you have submitted your order.  In accordance with BACB guidelines, you must be be logged in for the duration noted on the article. For example, for 1 Unit CEUs, you must be logged into the testing site for at least 50 minutes; for 2 Unit CEUs, you must be logged into the testing site for at least 1 hour and 40 minutes (100 minutes).
  • Written evaluative feedback must be given for every article.  It is listed as the last question for each quiz.
  • You understand that testing information is collected and, upon request, must be submitted to the BACB. *If at any time you have a complaint regarding any content within this website or any of its testing materials, please direct them directly to ABA Connection via our contact form HERE. The following instructions for making complaints comes directly from the BACB where "ACE provider/ACE Coordinator" represents ABA Connection, "BACB CE Event" represents the CEU articles, and "participant" represents YOU.  
  • All complaints, "including those regarding potential BACB CE Event Requirements violations must first be directed to the ACE provider/ACE coordinator in writing with copies of all written communications between the parties provided to the BACB. If a complaint cannot be resolved with the provider, the participant may file a formal complaint directly with the BACB using a form provided by the BACB upon request. The formal complaint must identify each event standard that was allegedly violated and specify the nature of the alleged violation. After reviewing the formal complaint, the BACB will inform the provider in writing about the complaint and will allow the provider 30 days to submit a written response to the BACB. At that time, the provider must also submit all documentation relating to the complaint as well as documentation of any and all other complaints received and resolved by the provider. If the provider fails to respond in a timely fashion, or if the evidence provided to the BACB does not adequately refute the allegations stated in the complaint, the provider’s approval status may be sanctioned by the BACB. Potential sanctioning actions include, but are not limited to: suspending the provider’s approval status until the complaint has been resolved to the BACB’s satisfaction; requiring the provider to revise its Type 2 CE events, procedures, and/or instructors; or revoking the provider’s approval status altogether. Decisions to sanction a provider may be appealed to the BACB Board of Directors in accordance with the BACB appeal procedures."

Payment Message:

This website accepts PayPal. If you do not currently have PayPal, you may submit payment as a guest on the PayPal website after you Submit an order. PayPal accepts Credit and Debit cards for those who do not have a PayPal account.  Please confirm purchase through their website directly.

Course Materials

Problem Behavior during Preference Assessments: An Empirical Analysis and Practical Recommendations (0.5 Units)

Preferences of 2 children with developmental disabilities, whose functional analyses indicated that their problem behavior was maintained by access to tangible items, were assessed using three formats (i.e., paired stimulus [PS], multiple-stimulus without replacement [MSWO], and free operant [FO]). The experimenter administered each format five times and compared levels of problem behavior across formats in a multielement design. Both participants exhibited problem behavior in PS and MSWO formats but not in the FO format. Results are discussed in terms of recommendations for practitioners.

This course is FREE for users of the following courses:
1 Year Complete Course Library
Are you a student of any of these courses?
Not a customer?